ACCEPTABILITY, COMPLICATIONS AND OUTCOMES BIBLIOGRAPHY

1. Bird ST, Harvey SM, Beckman LJ, Nichols MD, Rogers K, Blumenthal PD. Similarities in women's perceptions and acceptability of manual vacuum aspiration and electric vacuum aspiration for first trimester abortion. Contraception. Mar 2003;67(3):207-212.
Link to PubMed

2. Bird ST, Harvey SM, Nichols MD, Edelman A. Comparing the acceptability of manual vacuum aspiration and electric vacuum aspiration as methods of early abortion. J Am Med Womens Assoc. Summer 2001;56(3):124-126.
Link to PubMed

3. Castadot RG. Pregnancy termination: techniques, risks, and complications and their management. Fertil Steril. Jan 1986;45(1):5-17.
Link to PubMed

4. Davis A, Westhoff C, De Nonno L. Bleeding patterns after early abortion with mifepristone and misoprostol or manual vacuum aspiration. J Am Med Womens Assoc. 2000;55(3 Suppl):141-144.
Link to PubMed

5. Dean G, Cardenas L, Darney P, Goldberg A. Acceptability of manual versus electric aspiration for first trimester abortion: a randomized trial. Contraception. Mar 2003;67(3):201-206.
Link to PubMed

6. Hamoda H, Flett GM, Ashok PW, Templeton A. Surgical abortion using manual vacuum aspiration under local anaesthesia: a pilot study of feasibility and women's acceptability. J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care. Jul 2005;31(3):185-188.
Link to PubMed

7. Miller S, Billings DL, Clifford B. Midwives and postabortion care: experiences, opinions, and attitudes among participants at the 25th Triennial Congress of the International Confederation of Midwives. J Midwifery Womens Health. Jul-Aug 2002;47(4):247-255.
Link to PubMed